By Stefano Ferro
I have been running a travel photography website for few years. In conjunction, I also run some workshops and commonly receive many photography questions; however, there is one which comes up frequently:
What is your favourite camera for travelling today?
Fair enough, people want to upgrade or just change the model. I find however strange that I almost never get this question:
What lens should I buy for my next trip? Or what lens would you suggest for my travel adventure?
It seems that lenses always come second, based on what is left from the initial camera budget. It’s not uncommon to hear “the kit lens will do” when someone goes travelling.
But is it the right choice?
Maybe not. I may be too drastic, however, I believe that lenses are even more important than the cameras when talking about travel photography. I was once watching a lecture from Prof. Marc Levoy on lenses and differences when using the same camera, it was very interesting. It was part of an 18-lecture workshop that I would suggest everyone watches if they have some spare time. From this I have one lens buying tip: if you buy only one lens then allocate a budget at least similar, if not higher, to the one allocated to the purchase of the camera.
Do not buy a Ferrari with a FIAT engine (although the FIAT Group actually owns the Ferrari brand)!
Sunset on Southgate with the helicopter surprise
Fujifilm X-T1 – XF16-55mmF2.8 – F2.8 – 1/400 second – ISO200
How to choose the best travel lens?
If it is true that the best camera is always the one with you then the best lens is the one that will help to capture the majority of your photos in your trip.
Think about what lenses to take when travelling. For example, you should take multiple lenses that will cover a wide focal length through to a telephoto length, but also take into consideration the following:
- Weight of the lens
- Cost of the lens
- Risk of theft
I am in love with the Fujifilm X Series cameras. One of the reasons beside the light weight is the compact size, for instance, I can take a Fujifilm X-T2 in my bag for a full day of shooting and almost not feel it.
This is the way I want to travel. It’s important for me to keep my gear light, which is why I take a maximum of two lenses with me. When I travel on my own I usually change location every 2-3 days. Packing multiple lenses and transporting many of them is just not an option.
When I travel with my child I usually stay in a place for seven or more days. To be honest, I already have so many things that taking several lenses is simply not ideal. There is also a simple equation to think about as well, the more lenses you buy the higher the total cost of them. The risk factor of leaving multiple lenses in a hotel room is something you simply should not do.
So what do I do nowadays?
I just take two lenses with me and in some rare cases a third one. I make sure to include an all round zoom lens, a prime and an ultra wide angle or super zoom when absolutely needed.
Walking through the tiles
Fujifilm X-T2 with XF35mmF2 R WR – F2 – 1/40 second – ISO800
Recommended All Round Zoom Lens for Travelling
My favourite all-round lens for travelling is in the 24-80mm or 24-100mm focal range (35mm equivalent). As a rule of thumb, the wider the aperture the better, as this typically increases the photo opportunities. Personally, I would suggest using a lens that has an aperture of F2.8 or even lower.
Why such a wide aperture for travel photography?
- To have a narrow depth of field. Think of photos of architectural details or simply portraits of local people with a lovely blurred background.
- To make photos in low light environments, as the local markets, without pushing the ISO too high. I still remember how dark the fish market was in Port Louis (Mauritius)!
- To shoot without a tripod at sunset or at night. The wider you can go with the aperture the more light you will receive on your sensor without the need to use higher ISO levels.
Why as wide as 24mm (35mm equivalent)?
Because it’s a nice average wide angle to capture most of the typical photos you might come across when visiting landscapes, lanes/alleys or a new city.
Why 80mm or 100mm?
Because honestly, you will hardly need more than that. Let’s remember that we have legs too and we can move closer to the subject in most cases. Of course, there will be the time when you will regret that you have left behind the longer lens or you have not bought the lens that has a focal length of 400mm. Compromise compromise…
So, what all-round lens works best for a Fujifilm X Series camera?
I am personally in love with the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR lens. This lens provides a super fast F2.8 aperture that delivers beautiful bokeh (35mm equivalent focal length of around 24-85mm). This is my favourite all-round Fujinon lens that I would highly recommend for travel photography.
City view from St.Kilda, Melbourne
Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR – 55mm – 2 seconds – F3.2 – ISO200
I had the lens for testing and review. I was really impressed with its sharpness across the entire focal range without compromising on the corners. The autofocus was quick and silent too, which is really a feature you want when travelling. I always try to be invisible when taking photos by not making any noise that would alarm people around me. I found the zoom and aperture rings were very smooth and easy to operate. Lastly, the combined weather resistance was also really important when travelling in unpredictable weather conditions.
The only drawback of this lens is that it does not have image stabilisation. If you really want this feature you should check the XFujinon XF18-55mmF2.8-4 R LM OIS.
If you still think that the focal length of 80mm (35mm equivalent) is still not enough when travelling I would recommend the Fujinon XF18-135mm R LM OIS WR which, with a focal length of around 24-200mm (35mm equivalent), should cover everything you want to capture. The lens also is more affordable as well, however, you have to compromise with a slower aperture that offers F3.5-F5.6.
Fujifilm X-T2 with XF35mmF2 R WR – 35mm – 10 seconds – F16 – ISO100
Recommended Prime Lens for Travelling
Why buy a prime lens with a single focal length?
These are my four main reasons:
- Generally cheaper
- Offers great image quality
- Light in weight
- Smaller in size
A prime lens essentially has only one unique focal length which usually performs at the highest professional level. When travelling, I photograph quite a lot of markets that form an essential part of my work. If you have a mirrorless Fujifilm X Series camera with a small prime lens mounted you will be able to walk around unnoticed. If you arrive at a public place like a market with a zoom lens mounted on your camera then suddenly people around you might start thinking you are a professional photographer with expensive gear. This sort of attention is not something you want, especially in some countries where theft is common.
For a prime, I would suggest going for a focal length in the range of 50mm to 85mm (35mm equivalent). This will allow the most natural portraits to be captured. I personally use a 50mm focal length (35mm equivalent) as I like to get close to my subject, possibly have a talk, even if just with my hands (my Italian background helps a lot).
Love is our truth
Fujifilm X-T2 with Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR – 35mm – 1/13 second – F2 – ISO3200
I personally suggest the Fujinon XF35mm F2 R WR for a prime lens. I used this lens with the Fujifilm X-T2 and I could only love it. The small package was great to shoot with. Fujifilm does also offer the F1.4 version, however, for travelling, I do not feel I can justify the higher price.
Resting time for the chef
Fujifilm X-Pro2 with Fujinon XF35mmF1.4 R WR – 35mm – 1/40 seconds – F2 – ISO5000 – handheld
Alternatively, you can look also into the Fujinon XF50mmF2 R WR if you prefer a longer focal length.
Recommended Ultra Wide angle and Super Zoom Lens
I own an ultra wide angle lens and I sometimes rent or borrow a super zoom one.
Why an ultra wide angle lens?
I mostly use it for interior and architectural photography. If I am going to explore a city for a long weekend I may take it with me if I plan to visit churches, cathedrals or unique buildings. I use it also for some landscape photography, however mostly when my subject is actually in the foreground. For example a stone formation at a beach.
The Fujinon XF10-24mm F4 R OIS lens is the widest you can get in the XF range. It’s also optically stabilised which comes in handy when photographing in buildings or places where the tripod is not allowed.
Why a super zoom lens?
I need it rarely and that is why I have not bought it. It’s really mostly needed when travelling on a safari, photographing sports or wildlife. Last year, for instance, I used the super zoom for photographing a zoo safari in the middle of Australia – it definitely came in handy. The new XF100-400mm F4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens is probably all you need if you are photographing any of the mentioned subjects. An important note is that it is also a stabilised lens, something that is really a must for this focal length.
Sali e Tabacchi
Fujifilm X-Pro2 with Fujinon XF35mmF1.4 R WR – 35mm – 1/40 second – F2 – ISO1000 – Handheld
An equal budget should be allocated for the camera and the all-round lens. If there is any spare money left over then I would recommend investing in a prime lens as the secondary option. Any other lens can wait or can be rented. Remember that a good lens can always be used on a newer camera. Great lenses will always stay with you.
Happy travelling and enjoy your photography.
Hi Stefano. I agree with your thoughts on lenses and traveling, however I would point out that the 35mm f1.4 is not a WR lens. I own both of the 35mm lenses for that reason.
Indeed Keith you are right on the two 35mm. Thanks for pointing that out. Cheers
Indeed Keith, you are absolutely right about the difference of the 2 lenses. Great to see we have a similar view on lenses for travelling 🙂
I recently sold all my Nikon gear in favour of the Fuji X-T2. I am going on holiday to New England in the fall and had to choose my lens accordingly. I therefore bought my camera ‘body only’ and chose the Fujinon XF18-135mm R LM OIS WR to compliment it. I intend, as you suggest, to also purchase the Fujinon XF35mm F2 R WR. Between the two I hope to have the best and lightest options. So far, in practice, I have been most impressed by my new camera and lens.
The Nikon/Fujifilm migration was a big step Richard, but very wise I may add, at least in my opinion. Surely your back will be happier, Fujifilm gear is so much lighter 🙂
The 18-135mm is a great all round lens. I personally like to have the aperture ring on the lens (it makes things so much quicker) and unfortunately the 18-135 doesn’t have it, which is a pity. That’s the only drawback of this lens I think
One thing I have done with the 35mm was to use it at F2 even for wide angle photos (just in in case of low light environment). I did multiple photos and later stitched them together in post.
Have a great trip in New England
Thank you for this interview! Great and inspirational informations!
No worries Keira
I prefer 23mm f2 WR instead of 35mm f2…
Great article! I love my 24mm prime lens. Its a perfect travel camera package
I found the lack on OIS on the 16-55 a limitation as well as it’s weight. The 18-135 was the perfect balance for me. Really good OIS, and sharp. The lack of aperture signs is a miss though. With this, the 35mm/f2 and a small 14mm/2.8, I’m traveling light but with all the coverage I need.
The 16-55 2.8 is a great lens. The other zooms were not an option for me as they lack marked aperture rings (which was one of the main reasons for switching to Fujifilm). Large aperture and weathersealing were more important than stabilisation for sure. And the optical quality of the 2.8 is much better than the other zooms. And of course, it’s more quiet and a lot faster. All the advantages comes at a higher purchasing price and also with a weight penalty.
The weight is why I only use the 16-55 2.8 for work. Would never take it travelling.
For me the ultimate travel kit is the 23mm f2 and 35mm f2 with an X-Pro 2.
I am a student , just bought fujifilm xt-10 with XFujinon XF18-55mmF2.8-4 R LM OISii , though I wanted to bought fujifilm XT-2 . But I can’t afford it.
It is my first camera.
I have read a lot about Fuji x series lenses
Now I am eager to use them in my own hand.
Another option is to use two cameras with prime lenses: one from the X100 series (23mm lens, 37mm equivalent) and another from the Fuji range with a longer prime lens. Back in the day, I made great use of a Pentax 105mm prime (65mm in today speak) but most primes these days are the equivalent of either 80mm or 135mm. I find that for travel, most photos are best with a wide or standard lens.
Thank you so much for the great info on traveling with the Fuji lenses! I am new-ish to photography and I am in the market for the T2 and your blog was a huge help in figuring out which lenses to purchase. I am torn about the need for the XF100-400mm F4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR.. I will be using the camera for traveling as stated above but also for camping/hiking trips. Do you suggest the 100-400 mm or skip it altogether due to not enough use? I am leaning towards your suggestions of the 16-55mm f/2/8 and 35 mm f/2 for sure. Also, what are your thoughts on flashes? Any information or tips are greatly appreciated!!
You must log in to post a comment.